Good Practice
Develops Reciprocity and Cooperation Among Students
Learning is enhanced when it is more like a team effort than
a solo race. Good learning, like good work, is collaborative and social,
not competitive and isolated. Working with others often increases
involvement in learning. Sharing one's own ideas and responding to
others' reactions sharpens thinking and deepens understanding.
Technology Enhanced Support for the Practice
Students can participate in group dialogue and discussion using
communication tools such as email, discussion boards, and chat
systems. They can work collaboratively to produce multimedia presentations,
digital stories, and Web sites.
8 Ways to Get Students Engaged in
Online Discussion
8 Ways to Get Students Engaged in Online Discussion
Dr. William Klemm suggests eight guidelines to create a strong
collaborative learning environment in your course discussion boards.
These methods are designed to increase both the quality and quantity
of student participation.
-
Require Participation
Don’t let it be optional. Set aside a portion of the
grade allocation for quantity and quality of participation
in the online discussion.
Form Learning Teams
Collaborative learning can occur just as well in the online environment.
Asynchronous conferencing via discussion boards overcomes the
schedule coordination issues that often plague face-to-face teams.
Make the Activity Interesting
Make it relevant so that students will want to participate. Challenge
students to apply what they are learning.
Don’t Settle for Opinions
Encourage rigorous analysis and creative thought. Instructors
should insist that opinions must be supported with data or evidence.
Structure the Activity
Organize topics around course objectives. Structure provides guideposts
to help students think of things to contribute.
Require a Hand-In Assignment (Deliverable)
Deliverables could include idea generation and analysis, decisions,
plans and designs, proposals, case studies, problem generation
and solution, research projects, term papers or reports.
Know What You are Looking for and Involve Yourself to Help Make
It Happen
Participate in the discussion. When you offer feedback,
encouragement, and direction, students will become more involved.
-
Implement Peer Review and Grading
This can be a great way to encourage quality work. Be sure to provide
students with appropriate evaluation criteria.
From Fall 2003 ITC Topics
How to Engage Remote Students
How to Engage Remote Students
Interaction with course content and other students need not necessarily be synchronous.
There are a variety of technologies that will support individual and
group work regardless of the physical location of the students. Web
sites, discussion boards, email and chat rooms all facilitate instructor-to-student
and student-to-student interaction. Using these communications technologies
in conjunction with active learning principles can significantly increase
student engagement with the course content and the learning community.
Create teams of three to eight students. Each team is responsible
for researching and reporting on one aspect, or 'theme,' of the topic
under consideration. These teams may be of short or long duration,
from a single class session to an entire semester, depending on the
complexity of the topic and the instructional objectives of the teacher.
Regardless of the team composition or the duration of the team project,
it is critically important that each member of the team fully understands
the requirements of the assignment and the expectations for their
participation in the group processes and products.
From Fall 2004 ITC Topics
New Journaling, Blogging, and Collaborative Tools for Blackboard
New Journaling, Blogging, and Collaborative Tools for Blackboard
The Digital Native has been characterized as highly social and accustomed to networked,
collaborative environments. Online@UT (Blackboard) offers some built-in
tools to help create that environment. Now, in addition to Online@UT's
existing Discussion Forum and Virtual Classroom, new building blocks
provide additional opportunities for students to collaborate, to
share, and to reflect on their learning. The Campus Pack from Learning
Objects Inc. contains three building blocks now available in
Online@UT that allow students new ways to interact with each other
in a collaborative, password-protected, online learning environment.
Teams LX creates a collaborative Web space within
an Online@UT course that permits a group of students to work together
to create and manage information within a protected space. This
virtual space allows upload of many types of documents and live,
online editing of those documents. A group of students
could readily create a mini-Web site with graphics and live links
to external sites, as well as internal, non-linear navigation. This
kind of creation space was not available in Blackboard before this
building block.
Journal LX allows students to participate in blogging
(Weblogging), an ongoing sharing and documentation of one's ideas.
This journaling tool provides blog-space for students to create
knowledge, engage with content, and analyze their own work and the
work of others in a non-threatening environment. This tool can
increase a student's reflections and allow the student to become
a better evaluator of Internet information. Instructors can see
the student's cognitive development unfolding.
Journals can be used within a course site in three ways:
- Group journal area to work on a project in such a way that
the instructor can view individual contributions
- Individual student journal area
in which to write and formulate ideas or express opinions
- Course
journal area where instructor and students can discuss issues
Backpack LX creates a space where students can
assemble a series of Web pages that demonstrate discipline-specific
knowledge, career-focused goals, or personal interests. They can
then share their projects with students outside of their own courses
but within the UT academic community. This building block provides
the opportunity to showcase class projects, demonstrate knowledge
construction, and publish a reflective journal.
From Fall 2005 ITC Topics
The Practice in Action
Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries
Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries
Last year Dr. Matt Gray observed some specific student behaviors in his cohort-based
Wildlife Habitat Evaluation and Management course that concerned
him. Students had demonstrated a tendency to procrastinate on writing
their group reports, and the workload for team projects was occasionally
distributed unevenly, with a single student or two performing the
majority of the work. Given that as part of the ITC's
Wireless Instructional Initiatives (WII) 2005 project this year's
students would also have access to wireless laptops and Trimble
GeoXM handheld units (combination GPS receiver, GIS unit, and Personal
Digital Assistant (PDA) devices), Dr. Gray met with the WII team
this past summer to brainstorm appropriate instructional strategies
to address these student behaviors and make use of their new technology.
The team believed that student procrastination could be deterred
by providing a series of smaller deliverables with regular deadlines
and by having them utilize journaling to document their weekly progress.
Such journaling would also assist in making individual contributions
more apparent and discernible, thereby helping to identify lopsided
effort by team members. Dr. Gray also adjusted the course grading
rubric to incorporate these changes to provide sufficient motivation
for students.
Although he had previously developed standalone course websites,
Dr. Gray was also interested in the potential of some of the new
and existing features of Online@UT's
Blackboard software to "facilitate learning, information transfer,
and grading," especially given the team-based nature of his course.
ITC staff worked with him to explore and utilize relevant Online@UT
features for collaboration among teams for data analysis, reports,
and presentations, while simultaneously addressing his other course
goals and realizing administrative efficiencies.
Ultimately he opted to have his students use the system to, among
other things: - Document the progress being made on developing their
group management plans by using the new Journal LX tool.
- Post
sections of their management plans online, via the new Teams LX
tool, to be reviewed and edited by other team members, the teaching
assistant, and instructor.
- Submit anonymous questions to a message
board so the instructor could respond via a threaded discussion.
From Leveraging Technology for Course Transformation – 2005 Spotlight on Matt Gray, Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries
Business and Professional Communication
Business and Professional Communication
Dr. Linda Sennett uses Online@UT
to enable group-work so that students can get a taste of the group
dynamics they are likely to experience in today's business world.
At the beginning of each semester, she asks students to complete
various survey instruments and exercises, such as the Herrmann Brain
Dominance Instrument. Dr. Sennett then works to assign students to "balanced,
whole-brain teams" based on criteria including their profile results,
their majors, how far along they are in school, and other personal
observations. Many assignments, including the final exam, involve
working in those teams. She has found that team test taking improves
student retention of material, because when team members disagree,
they are forced to articulate, research, and defend their positions,
knowing that everyone's grade on the team exam will be impacted.
From Improving Communication Using Technology – 2004 Spotlight on Linda Sennett, Communication Studies
Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management
Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management
Creating groups or teams inside a (Online@UT) course site to work
on group projects provides Dr. Laura Jolly with a major development
tool to move students forward. Within a class of 85 students, she
creates eight groups, two for each of the following areas: Retail
industry, Restaurant industry, Hotel industry, and Recreation/tourism
industry.
The project requires two types of postings: a company summary, two-pages
in length, and a PowerPoint presentation which requires them to
persuade an audience to engage with their company. Before the advent
of the course management systems, students would photocopy each
two-page report, creating enough copies for everyone in the class.
Stacks of company reports were then distributed, requiring massive
paper use. File exchange and the digital drop box feature have made
sharing of information more effective and efficient. This method
also mirrors the kind of collaborative team work they will be engaged
in after graduation.
From Preparing Students for Professional Success – 2003 Spotlight
on Laura Jolly, Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management
Mental Health Counseling
Mental Health Counseling
By integrating technology into mental health counseling Dr. William
Conwill finds that he is able to facilitate collaborative work for
students. Assigning students to work in groups toward a final presentation
allows them to experience the challenges of collaborative work and
at the same time, gives them rich material to examine how their
personalities are impacting the group dynamics. The focus of the
course is indeed Personality and Mental Health. Dr. Conwill is also
able to reach the quieter students in a new way. Using both private
e-mail between himself and his students, as well as the class e-mail
function within CourseInfo (Blackboard) allows him to create sharing
opportunities that work for both extrovert and introvert. One student's
comment came to his mind, "This is the first course I have ever
taken where you learn about the other people in the course." Sometimes
the technology can enhance in ways you had not predicted.
From Extending Vision with the New Tools of Technology - 2001 Spotlight
on William Conwill, Educational Psychology & Counseling
Human Services
Human Services
One of the goals of the Thinking About People course is to help students understand
how the human development and human service practice relates to
their own personal lives. With the use of an internet forum this
semester, students have been able to share with each other their
own experiences as they relate to particular life stages (such as
infancy, early childhood, adolescence). One such question the students
addressed during the study of early adulthood was: "Choose an issue
such as abortion, capital punishment or other social issues. Define
your position as you think about the issue today. How did you think
about it when you were 17? What are the differences in your thinking
process?" Students not only had the opportunity to exchange responses
with their classmates, but they replied to at least two of their
classmates. Many of the dialogues that began through the internet
have continued within the class setting.
From Thinking About People in Online Learning - 1999 Spotlight
on Marianne Woodside, Educational Psychology & Counseling
|
|